Best Practices¶
Guidelines for effective and responsible vibecoding. These practices will help you get better results while maintaining code quality and security.
Code Quality¶
Always Review Generated Code¶
AI can generate code that looks correct but has subtle issues:
- Logic errors - The code runs but doesn't do what you expect
- Performance issues - Inefficient algorithms or unnecessary operations
- Security vulnerabilities - SQL injection, XSS, insecure defaults
- Missing edge cases - Happy path works, error cases don't
Never Commit Without Review
Treat AI-generated code like code from a junior developer - it needs review before going to production.
Understand What You Ship¶
If you can't explain how code works, you shouldn't ship it:
Good: "I used this caching decorator because it memoizes expensive
function calls and invalidates after 5 minutes."
Bad: "The AI suggested this and it seems to work."
Test Thoroughly¶
AI-generated code needs the same (or more) testing as human-written code:
- Unit tests for individual functions
- Integration tests for component interactions
- Edge case testing (empty inputs, large inputs, invalid data)
- Security testing for user-facing code
Security¶
Review for Vulnerabilities¶
Always check generated code for common security issues:
| Vulnerability | What to Look For |
|---|---|
| SQL Injection | String concatenation in queries |
| XSS | Unescaped user input in HTML |
| CSRF | Missing token validation |
| Auth bypass | Missing permission checks |
| Secrets | Hardcoded API keys or passwords |
Don't Share Sensitive Data¶
Be careful what you include in prompts:
Never Include in Prompts
- API keys and secrets
- Production database credentials
- Customer data or PII
- Proprietary business logic you don't want shared
- Access tokens
Sanitize Before Sharing¶
When pasting code for review, remove or redact:
# Before
api_key = "sk-abc123realkey456"
db_url = "postgresql://user:realpassword@prod.server.com/db"
# After
api_key = "sk-REDACTED" # Replace with your API key
db_url = "postgresql://user:password@localhost/db"
Efficiency¶
Break Down Large Tasks¶
Instead of asking for an entire application, break it down:
Step 1: "Help me design the data model"
Step 2: "Create the database schema"
Step 3: "Build the authentication system"
Step 4: "Add the core API endpoints"
Step 5: "Implement the frontend components"
Provide Relevant Context¶
Give the AI what it needs, but not more:
Good: "I have a FastAPI app using SQLAlchemy. Here's my User model:
[paste model]. I need to add an endpoint to update user profiles."
Bad: [Pastes entire codebase of 50 files]
Iterate Quickly¶
Don't try to get everything perfect in one prompt:
- Get a working version
- Test it
- Refine with follow-up prompts
- Repeat until satisfied
Learning¶
Ask for Explanations¶
Use AI to learn, not just to generate:
"Can you explain why you used a generator here instead of returning
a list? What are the trade-offs?"
Compare Approaches¶
Learn about different solutions:
"Show me how to implement this using:
1. A class-based approach
2. A functional approach
3. Using a library
What are the pros and cons of each?"
Document Your Learnings¶
Keep notes on patterns that work well:
## Vibecoding Notes
### Effective Patterns
- Using docstrings first helps generate better implementations
- Breaking authentication into steps: validation, verification, token generation
- Asking for error handling separately improves code structure
### Lessons Learned
- Always verify regex patterns with edge cases
- Generated SQL needs review for N+1 queries
- Date handling needs explicit timezone specification
Workflow¶
Version Control Everything¶
Commit frequently so you can revert if needed:
Use Descriptive Commits¶
Indicate when AI assisted with the code:
feat: add email validation
- Validates email format using regex
- Checks for common typo domains
- AI-assisted implementation, reviewed for security
Maintain Your Standards¶
AI should adapt to your codebase, not the other way around:
Checklist¶
Before shipping AI-generated code:
- [ ] I understand how this code works
- [ ] I've reviewed for security vulnerabilities
- [ ] I've tested with normal inputs
- [ ] I've tested with edge cases
- [ ] I've tested with invalid inputs
- [ ] The code follows project conventions
- [ ] The code is properly documented
- [ ] I've removed any sensitive data
- [ ] The code passes all existing tests
- [ ] I can explain this code in a code review